The Department of Buildings issued two separate violations at the same address on the same day, per OATH/ECB hearing records: 114 Bruckner Boulevard in the Bronx (10454), where an active 14-story new building with an ongoing support-of-excavation (SOE — the shoring and bracing system that holds a foundation excavation open) operation is under construction by respondent On Star Management LLC.

The first ticket, number 039555870X, cites work not conforming to approved SOE plans — DOB records describe a missing shoring system at the corners of adjacent properties on exposures 2 and 4, dated June 25, 2026, with a total violation amount of $1,250. The second, ticket 039555871H, issued the same morning at the same address, cites tripping hazards on the public sidewalk — multiple cracks and an uneven surface at exposures 1 and 4 — also carrying a $1,250 violation amount. Both are scheduled for an OATH hearing on September 4, and both already carry a hearing result of "in violation" in the Case Status dataset, per OATH/ECB records.

The Bronx tower ticket sits inside a broader batch: OATH/ECB Hearings (Case Status) records show at least 20 separate Bronx violation tickets heading to hearing on September 4, all issued by the Department of Buildings between June 9 and July 1, 2026. Several involve active construction sites rather than routine building maintenance. At 2873 Valentine Avenue (10458), respondent Platinum Services NY LLC was cited for supported scaffolding installed with needle beams on the 6th floor where approved plans call for the 4th floor, and base frames that don't match the approved height — a $1,250 violation. At 2098 Creston Avenue (10453), a full-demolition site run by N Tech Design of America drew a $1,250 housekeeping citation for construction debris and rock rubble across the sidewalk and roadway. At 2 Wade Square (10457), Innovative Constr NYC LLC was cited $1,250 for excessive construction debris on the 5th floor.

Other active-site citations in the batch: 2270 Bassford Avenue (10457), New Line Construction LLC, $1,250 for a construction fence gate that doesn't match approved double-swing-gate plans; 2055 Ryer Avenue (10457), SKF General Contractors, $1,250 for using a fire hydrant without the backflow-prevention device required under a DEP permit at a 12-story new building in its superstructure phase; and 511 East 146 Street (10455), Betances Rad LLC/Wavecrest Management, $1,250 for a locked gate restricting a required secondary means of egress. The remaining tickets in the batch — elevator maintenance items at buildings including 1295 Morris Avenue and 1901 Loring Place, and building-wall or code-compliance citations at addresses including 787 Elsmere Place and 2647 Sedgwick Avenue — are property-maintenance violations rather than active-jobsite citations, per the same dataset.

None of the violations reviewed involve a reported injury. All are enforcement records, not court findings beyond the OATH hearing process itself — a violation marked "in violation" in Case Status reflects OATH's administrative determination, not a criminal or civil court judgment.

For contractors: a $1,250 non-conformance charge (code B282, "work does not conform to approved construction documents") is the most common charge type in this batch, and it's the one that follows a site through multiple inspections if the underlying condition — the wrong gate, the wrong scaffold configuration, the missing shoring detail — isn't corrected to match the filed plans. If your firm holds a permit at any of these addresses or works for one of these respondents, the ticket numbers above are searchable on the OATH Hearings Division portal and DOB NOW: check compliance status before the September 4 hearing date, since additional penalties accrue on tickets that go unaddressed.

Separately, and for context only: DOB's citywide complaint feed logged roughly 100 new complaints in the two days ending September 3, 2026, spanning categories from elevator issues to illegal conversions across all five boroughs, per DOB Complaints Received data. A complaint is an unverified allegation, not a violation or a finding, and none of the complaints in that feed are tied to the OATH tickets above.

Source: NYC OATH/ECB Hearings (Case Status), dataset jz4z-kudi, accessed via NYC Open Data; DOB Complaints Received, NYC Open Data.