Seven Department of Buildings cases went to hearing on October 20, all resulting in findings of "in violation," per OATH/ECB hearing records (dataset jz4z-kudi). All seven properties are in Queens, and six of the seven involve the same charge code: failure to maintain a building in a code-compliant manner.
At 348 Beach 67 Street in Arverne, the respondent of record is 348 Beach 67 LLC. DOB observed missing and loose siding at the second-floor section on the building's front exposure, according to the violation details, creating what the inspector described as an unsafe condition for the public and the property. The hearing officer found the respondent in violation and set a penalty of $1,250. The case shows full compliance with hearing terms.
At 90-38 Corona Avenue in Elmhurst, respondent 9038 Elmhurst Inc. was cited after an inspector gained access to the building and found the third-floor roof hatch removed and replaced with sealed glass, blocking roof access, per the violation record. The hearing resulted in a finding of in violation and a $1,250 penalty, with compliance terms met.
At 61-49 164 Street in Queens, respondent Mojib Husain was cited for a parking regulation violation — a vehicle with New York plate BNF 7181 found with invalid registration and inspection parked at the front of the premises in a residential district, per DOB records. That hearing carried a $500 penalty.
At 213-42 35 Avenue in Queens, respondent T I Construction Inc. was cited over a construction fence at an active three-story mixed-use new building site. DOB's violation details describe a pile of debris stored near the fence, next to an opening at the bottom of a fence panel, cited as inadequate housekeeping under the Building Code. The hearing resulted in a $1,250 penalty, which records show has been paid in full.
At 36-17 Prince Street in Flushing, respondent Huang's Realty was cited after an inspector found a gutter leader on the building's left side, at exposure 2, not connected to the storm drainage system — allowing water to flow onto the sidewalk, per the violation record. The hearing produced a $1,250 penalty.
At 64-50C 188 Street in Fresh Meadows, respondent Queens Fresh Meadows LLC was cited for improperly braced air conditioning units around the building, including one unit at an apartment section's rear left hanging above a basement entrance, according to DOB's violation details. The penalty was set at $1,250.
At 83-84 116 Street in Richmond Hill, respondent 8384 116 Owners Corp was cited under the Building Code's elevator maintenance provision. DOB's violation details cite an inoperative emergency car phone signal and no access provided to the motor room. That hearing carried a $625 penalty.
Separately, DOB's complaint-received log shows one new elevator-related complaint entered October 19 at 98-39 65 Road in Queens (complaint number 4A55515, category 6S, unit ELEVR), listed as active. A complaint reflects an unverified report and is not itself a finding of a violation.